but I thought that the reason Clark had to give up his powers to get together with Lois in Superman II was for Nivenish reasons
I just watched Superman III tonight (it was on, and I was curious as to whether it was as bad as I remembered), and even though Singer & Co. are using Superman I & II as their backstory, it's actually movie canon that Superman can have sex with a human. Because he does in SIII, with the villain's henchwoman. Granted, it's during a period where something's affecting him the way red kryptonite affects SV Clark -- making him an amoral version of himself -- but it didn't affect his *powers*. He slept with the henchwoman without killing her, so in movie-verse (as well as SV-verse) Kryptonians can safely have sex with humans.
Not that it matters any more because I've decided that Lois needs to stay with Richard and for the sequels, Clark should get someone like Cat Grant or a *completely-nothing-like-SV's-version* Lana Lang.
no subject
I just watched Superman III tonight (it was on, and I was curious as to whether it was as bad as I remembered), and even though Singer & Co. are using Superman I & II as their backstory, it's actually movie canon that Superman can have sex with a human. Because he does in SIII, with the villain's henchwoman. Granted, it's during a period where something's affecting him the way red kryptonite affects SV Clark -- making him an amoral version of himself -- but it didn't affect his *powers*. He slept with the henchwoman without killing her, so in movie-verse (as well as SV-verse) Kryptonians can safely have sex with humans.
Not that it matters any more because I've decided that Lois needs to stay with Richard and for the sequels, Clark should get someone like Cat Grant or a *completely-nothing-like-SV's-version* Lana Lang.