norwich36: (Default)
norwich36 ([personal profile] norwich36) wrote2009-03-30 11:20 pm
Entry tags:

Dreamwidth?

So I've been playing around with the idea of buying a seed account at Dreamwidth when they go up for sale on April 30, since apparently this is the only time ever they will be selling permanent accounts, but the fact that only a few people on my f-list seem to even know about the project makes me question whether it's worth shelling out that much money. So: a poll.


[Poll #1375329]

For those of you who checked the last radio button, here are some good resources to read about the project:
Links to a bunch of posts explaining why this project was undertaken--see especially this one , in which [livejournal.com profile] synechdochic explains why she undertook this project; Dreamwidth's wiki page; a post explaining how Dreamwidth is different than other fan-run journaling sites ; a post by [livejournal.com profile] cathexys about why dreamwidth is right for her ; and a post by [livejournal.com profile] zvi_likes_tv about getting started on Dreamwidth , for those lucky enough to have closed beta accounts.

[identity profile] anoel.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 06:37 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's going to take some time for people to hear about Dreamwidth and switch over but with the cross posting option more and more people will do it, see it's the best choice and stay there permanently. So I'm getting a permanent account to support an amazing project, get a name there to last forever and not have to worry about paying and because I truly believe this will be fandom's home for the future.

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
That's very optimistic. I'm less convinced that enough of fandom is going to migrate there without some additional push factor from LJ, but maybe I'll be wrong. But I admire you getting a permanent account to support the site.

[identity profile] anoel.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's pretty likely LJ will pull some crap again. In the end, I just can't imagine fandom staying on LJ long term. We need a place that's safe for fandom, that supports us and that LISTENS to user input. Superior product will help a lot. But it took a long time to build up LJ so I think it's going to take a long time to switch over. This way I have a permanent account while I wait it out AND I don't have to pay LJ anymore.
rsadelle: (Default)

[personal profile] rsadelle 2009-04-01 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not convinced that another journaling service will be the next big thing in fandom. The fannish technology trajectory is zines to listservs to LJ. I suspect the next big thing will be something we haven't thought of/don't know of/doesn't exist yet.

[identity profile] anoel.livejournal.com 2009-04-01 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
The difference with Dreamwidth is they're willing to change and upgrade to make it a better place for fandom. It's not going to be stuck with one thing but able to change with the times. It's not just another journaling service, it's one that is looking to be the best and FOR its users. I don't see a reason to stick around with LJ just because the best new thing hasn't been discovered yet. We have to make the best of what we have because who knows when that new thing, if there ever is, will happen.
ext_2583: "Lady Agnew" by John Singer Sargent (Livejournal: Because my account is perma)

[identity profile] mskatej.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
I don't want to leave LJ because I like being at a service that isn't just for fandom (I really don't believe we need to be *more* insular), but if everyone migrates I may change my mind.
zorkian: Icon full of binary ones and zeros in no pattern. (Default)

[personal profile] zorkian 2009-03-31 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi -- hope you don't mind me randomly popping in here. I'm one of the co-owners of Dreamwidth ([livejournal.com profile] synecdochic's other half), and we tend to scour the Internets for mention of Dreamwidth to answer questions and generally (try to) be useful.

Anyway, I just wanted to point out that while we expect fannish people to be among our earliest adopters, the site is not for fandom. It's for everybody. Personally, I have never read or written fic in my life and can't really tell you what the fascination is with putting Daniel and Jack in the same room together, and I am half-owner! :)

If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. Otherwise, it was nice meeting you, and I'll be on my way now!
ext_2583: "Lady Agnew" by John Singer Sargent (Actress: Kristen Bell - coy smile)

[identity profile] mskatej.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you!

If/when someone offers me an invite code I'll totally sign my name up - I certainly don't want to be left behind. But I'm personally really happy here. I like LJ a lot and I don't have any issues with the organisation (like a lot of other fans do), but I'm here as part of fandom so ultimately I'll do whatever everyone else does, no matter how much I'd rather resist change. :P

[identity profile] skuf.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It's really not for fandom - it's actually one of my [few] :o/ about it!

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, I didn't expect the Dreamwidth owners to be bopping around answering questions!

I actually am not unhappy with LJ at the moment, though I do wonder if that could suddenly change yet again. I like the philosophy behind dreamwidth, and a few people I like a lot are permanently migrating there, but I think fandom as a whole is pretty lazy and settled in its ways unless deliberately prodded. I'm going to buy a paid account to support the site, but I suspect unless something happens I'll use it about as much as I use my IJ account, which is about once every 3 months.

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, p.s., since I'm sure paid users are going to get a certain amount of invite codes to give out, you're definitely first on my list for one.
ext_2583: "Lady Agnew" by John Singer Sargent (Heart balloon)

[identity profile] mskatej.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Awwww! You are the sweetest. Thank you. ♥ ♥ ♥
ext_30194: Katie McGrath as Morgana on BBC's 'Merlin', smiling with flowers (H - *grin*)

[identity profile] shopfront.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
I'm planning to buy a permanent account, because I figure if we do end up migrating there, I'm happy to keep up payments and support the site that way. I was a lot younger when I bought a permanent account on eljay, and yearly paid account payments were dependent on my parents, so that security of features was the biggest incentive for me to purchase one here. Now that I'm older and regular account payments are down to me and not really something I'm concerned about being able to keep up, that's no longer an issue, and I er on the side of if you have a permanent account once you've been on the site for x amount of time you're no longer an asset for the people running the place.

Not that I'm concerned at this stage that lessening my/our ongoing financial worth to Dreamwidth will mean we'll get put on the back burner for the people running Dreamwidth (after all, if I got the same vibe from them that we've gotten from LJ the last few years, I wouldn't even consider moving over at all) - but given that I now can, I'd like to support the site more in the long run if we end up staying there long term. I'd say to hell with it, buy a permanent account, and just continue to invest in goodies for friends and other ongoing ways to financially support them, buut... I know myself too well. Good intentions will turn into one of those things I kept meaning to do but somehow forgot about if I have the convenience of constant extra features for myself, heh. I figure there are probably quite a few people hoping to snag a permanent account anyway, so they won't have any trouble selling as many as they need/want to.

So while, yes, of course my long term use will be determined by how successfully we built a community there, I'm hopeful about that building effort, and my account choice isn't really reflective of how committed I am to the service. I'd also really, really like to migrate completely and leave livejournal behind altogether. *crosses fingers*

eta: also, after reading the comments, my two cents are that while I don't expect the userbase will be as diverse as it is here (at least not for quite some time, aside from perhaps other niche groups that are invested in having a friendlier home like fandom is invested in it), I'm not too concerned because I'm pretty much on livejournal for the fandom. Given that they've stated that a more diverse userbase is necessary for the site to be around for a long time, it's not something I'm too concerned about happening. If fandom ends up having a higher chunk of the userbase than we have here though, that won't bother me at all! :P Also that, yes, it'll take some patience for us to really rebuilt the community feel there and get our bearings. I'm more hopeful for it happening though, because this seems like a bazillion times better option that IJ, GJ, JF, etc., which all failed because there was no incentive for the stragglers to go join the initial masses that grabbed accounts there and considered moving.
Edited 2009-03-31 09:12 (UTC)

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait, I'm confused. You are or aren't going to buy a permanent account? Because it sounds like not, because you want to keep paying to support the site.

I don't know if I want to migrate completely. I don't even know if I want fandom as a whole to migrate completely. Just the thought of what that means to all my delicious bookmarks gives me a massive headache. But on the other hand, I would like to be free of the whims of our capitalist overlords.
ext_30194: David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor on Doctor Who, frustrated with a hand over his face (DW - gene pool running low on chlorine)

[identity profile] shopfront.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
*facepalm* That's what I get for commenting in a rush. Even with an edit I didn't catch the big mistakes. Sorry, you got it right. I meant I won't be buying a permanent account, because I want to still be paying to support the site if we end up staying there (and don't trust myself to be consistent about supporting the site financially in ways other than paying for my own use.)

Do you think people will as a whole destroy old content? I would expect more people just to start building new content (as well as migrating old content over for archive purposes) on DW instead. It would be my ideal to leave LJ behind for good, and move to a new 'home', and I must admit I'd be willing to sacrifice delicious bookmarks if it came down to it. But while some might delete their old content here, I imagine most people won't. I mean, it kind of goes against the grain to destroy all those links unless you really have to, y'know?

edit: hell. I should just give up and walk away right now. *headdesk*
Edited 2009-03-31 22:17 (UTC)

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't worry--I do that kind of thing all the time.

Unfortunately I have found that a lot of folks who migrated to IJ from HP and RPS fandoms did in fact delete their LJ content, so yeah, I think that might happen, especially because a lot of the folks most motivated to move are doing so because they hate LJ. (And I have over 1000 delicious bookmarks now, most of them linking to LJ entries, so...ouch.)
ext_30194: Katie McGrath as Morgana on BBC's 'Merlin', smiling with flowers (SV - kind of like kissing cousins?)

[identity profile] shopfront.livejournal.com 2009-04-01 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose because I think the flaw behind the move to IJ etc. was that it was motivated by push factors and not enough pull factors, so I see the people that moved to IJ properly and deleted their content here to be the more... I guess the extreme end of the bell curve, in some ways. A lot of fandom didn't go anywhere because we needed push and pull factors to make the effort worth our time, whereas the people who made a successful move to IJ were motivated despite the lack of pull factors. So, when, for instance, the appeal of IJ was that it wasn't LJ, deleting content here makes sense. It's a backlash from the people who were upset enough to go on push factors (mostly or) alone.

If the move to DW is successful, I expect it'll be a slow move that's motivated by pull factors (which is why I'm hopeful about DW in the first place, because I think the site sounds appealing now independent of LJ, not just because LJ stuffed up and we want to get away.) I think a lot of fandom on LJ still has some element of push factor motivating our interest in what DW could end up being, but for most of us it just wasn't enough. So I think pull factors (mostly how much of the fan community goes there, the appeal of the owners there as far as our feeling of home and safety goes, and the appeal of the feature tweaks) are really going to be the deciding factor, and when the deciding factor isn't actually totally or even majorly about LJ, I would expect far less in the way of content deletion.

So, I wouldn't say content deletion won't happen, but I (personally) can't imagine it'll happen on a totally devastating scale. I think a lot of the people who are more invested in depriving LJ of content than they are in maintaining our sense of history and connection, even if they're only interested in maintaining it for long enough for people to start redirecting and rebuilding their connections to the content in new places, are very push motivation. And any devastation will be a slow process that there'll be time to fix, because a lot of those people already left for IJ and deleted their content, and I expect the remaining people will need time to be confident that the pull factors will still be enticing and stable three or six months down the road, let along years later.
melusina: (Default)

[personal profile] melusina 2009-03-31 11:21 am (UTC)(link)
Slight correction - I'm buying a paid account (or getting an invite) as soon as possible and moving permanently, albeit gradually. I can't justify the expense of a seed account right now, although I desperately want one. . .

I think it's going to be the next big migration, although it will certainly take time for people to make the transition.

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess the big factor in migration is who goes, and whether they bring their friends along with them. I just know that for myself, I am unlikely to keep up with more than one journalling site (I almost never check my IJ flist), so it will require a critical mass of users moving over for me to truly migrate, even though I am planning on buying an account.

[identity profile] huzzlewhat.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll buy a paid account — the seed idea is attractive, but money's a bit tight right now, and I can't justify it. But I want to claim my name, and if it's as good as the buzz indicates, it might just be my main base in the future. But... I bought a permanent (very cheap) account at InsaneJournal, in case the Great Fannish Migration happened, and it didn't. And since I'm on LJ for the fandoms, I'm a little wary.


[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that's my feeling too. It's true that there's a segment of fandom that really *did* migrate over to IJ--Harry Potter, mostly, and mainly because of the underage issues--for the most part fandom did not migrate, despite its expressed outrage. So I'm wondering if there will be a true migration, absent new push factors from LJ. I do like the philosophy of the site, and the general look of it, a lot more than LJ or IJ, so I'm buying an account to support it, but I just don't know about whether it's going to become the new center of fandom or not.

And though part of me wants to be free of our LJ overlords, as I said to someone above, the thought of what a widespread fannish migration to DW would do to my delicious bookmarks makes me cry, honestly. (I was hoping the Archive of our Own would mitigate that a little, but I'm starting to wonder if they're *ever* going to open to the general public).

[identity profile] serenography.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I know nothing about this, so thanks for the information and links. I'll definitely check them out.

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm really surprised I haven't seen it mentioned more often on my f-list, actually. One of the people behind it is a fan who also was an LJ employee, so she has an lot of experience with what users actually want out of the service, which is a good sign, for me. And if you have the free time to read through some of those links, it seems to me they have a very well thought-out philosophy and business plan. I'm definitely supporting the site, even if I don't really migrate over there--it's hard for me to imagine fully migrating unless all my friends come too.

[identity profile] morgandawn.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 04:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't pick an option - I am planning on (a) finding out if they support cross-posting using semagic. I don't have time to manage a seperate blog. then I will need to test out the authenticated RSS feeds (so I can aggregate content from LJ and other blogs), then I will buy a month to month paid account to test it. If it works, I might spring for more,.

interoperability is what will drive me.

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Here's what the wiki currently says about compatibility with semagic:
http://wiki.dwscoalition.org/notes/Compatible_clients

I didn't find info on rss feeds in a quick search, but I suppose you really need to test them to see how they work anyway.

[identity profile] morgandawn.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
nods. LJ cannot handle authenticated feeds - I have to use a special newsfeeder reader to follow people on JF and insanejournal. The list of blog editors is great - I want to test out the Firefox one.

[identity profile] skuf.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't have $200 to throw at something like that, but I plan to cross-post there (i.e. to IJ/DW, since I'm not posting at LJ), hopefully making it my primary journal, if it feels as welcoming and open as IJ. I don't need a seed acount for it :o)

[identity profile] norwich36.livejournal.com 2009-03-31 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you think there's going to be a fair bit of migration from IJ to DW?
foxfirefey: A fox colored like flame over an ornately framed globe (Default)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2009-04-03 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
I'll note that Dreamwidth is interested in working with Squeaky to update IJ to the Dreamwidth codebase, if he decides that's what he wants to do.

[identity profile] skuf.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I think a lot of IJ'ers plan to at least get an account, probably cross-posting.